Research
Book Project
Women’s wings are a stable feature of political parties, with nearly 40 percent of parties including them in their institutional structure as a way to encourage women’s ascent to political power. Yet, there exists no correlation between the presence of a women’s wing and women’s electoral candidacy within these parties. Why do gender-inclusive political institutions fail to advance women’s political careers in practice? In my dissertation and book project, I introduce the concept of the “political glass wall’’ to explain how women’s wings condition women’s political entry and stymie their mobility and candidacy in the party. I argue that women’s wings function as a sorting mechanism. Women without elite political networks enter through the women’s wing, while networked women bypass it entirely. Once in the wing, women face stymied lateral mobility into the main party organization and limited vertical advancement. Moreover, elites prioritize sociopolitical capital in promotion decisions that women’s wing members do not possess and cannot accumulate within wings relegated to mobilization tasks rather than strategic decision-making. I draw on over 56 elite interviews and an original survey of 1,054 party elites from two of India’s largest political parties – Bharatiya Janata Party and Aam Aadmi Party – to substantiate these claims. The book project underscores that ostensibly gender-egalitarian institutions can institutionalize discrimination by creating parallel, unequal career tracks that exclude women from centers of power.
Survey Instrument | Pre-Analysis Plan
Peer Reviewed Articles
Siwakoti, Samikshya, Yadav, Kamya, Bariletto, Nicola, Zanotti, Luca, Erdoğdu, Ulaş, and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2021. How COVID drove the evolution of fact-checking. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-69
Other Articles
Yadav, Kamya, Erdoğdu, Ulaş, Siwakoti, Samikshya, Shapiro, Jacob N., and Alicia Wanless. 2021. Countries have more than 100 laws on the books to combat misinformation. How well do they work? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2021.1912111
Siwakoti, Samikshya, Yadav, Kamya, Thange, Isra, Bariletto, Nicola, Zanotti, Luca, Ghoneim, Alaa, and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2021. Localized Misinformation in a Global Pandemic: Report on COVID-19 Narratives Around the World. Empirical Studies of Conflict, Princeton University.
Book Chapter
Yadav, Kamya, Wanless, Alicia, and Samantha Lai. 2025. Multilateral Efforts on Information Integrity: Why Greater Definition is Needed. Springer Handbook on Disinformation: A Multidisciplinary Analysis.
Working Papers
When Gatekeepers Open the Gates: Internal Party Quotas as Reputation Building Strategies
Kinship and Women’s Collective Efficacy in Malawi (Metaketa V)
With Amanda Clayton, Amanda L. Robinson, Boniface Dulani, and Asiyati Cheweza
“It’s My Duty”: How Social Norms May Incentivize Peer-to-Peer Correction of False Claims Online
With Rachel Xu | Pre-Analysis Plan
Works in Progress
Unlocking Urban Democracy: Voter Engagement in Local Level Zambian Politics
With Leonardo Arriola, Nicholas Dorward, and Melanie Phillips
Candidate Selection and Withdrawal in Urban Politics in Rajasthan, India
With Priyadarshi Amar, Anirvan Chowdhury, and Varun Karekurve-Ramachandra
Gatekeepers of Representation: The Role of Candidate Training Programs on Minority Candidate Supply
With Diana Da In Lee